Help on Tele2, tariffs, questions

Financial and Economic Department of the Russian Orthodox Church, the Union of Architects of Russia and the Guild of Temple Builders announced an open architectural competition "Project of an Orthodox church with a capacity of 300, 600 and 900 people with a parish complex", according to the website of the Construction Program Orthodox churches in Moscow ("Programs-200").

Following the results of the competition, the jury and the expert council, which included well-known representatives of the architectural community, priests of the Russian Orthodox Church and historians of temple architecture, will select 9 winning projects - three in each category.

Professional architects, students of architectural universities and groups of authors are invited to participate in the competition.

A post on the website of the Program for the Construction of Orthodox Churches in Moscow (“Program-200”) states: “Many churches have been built over the past two decades. However, we have to admit that not all design solutions meet the architectural and artistic requirements, as well as the buildings themselves - the technical conditions of modern construction.

The organizers of the competition also emphasize that today the design of economical and at the same time quite spacious and functionally filled churches, which have all the necessary premises for organizing a full-fledged parish life, is becoming relevant.

“In the conditions of limited budgets, there is a real need to diversify the palette of external and internal architecture of churches and Orthodox church complexes,” the announcement of the start of the competition says.

Projects of temples for the "Program-200"

Currently, within the framework of the "Program-200", 8 standard projects of Orthodox churches with a capacity of 200 to 600 people are mainly used.

The developers of the projects were OJSC “Scientific Research and Design Institute of Civil Engineering, Improvement and Urban Design “Mosproekt-3”, OJSC “Mosproekt-2” named after. M. V. Posokhin, JSC "Moscow Research and Design Institute of Typology, Experimental Design" (MNIITEP), as well as LLC "Project +".

Typical projects of churches for 200 parishioners

Designer - PROJECT+ LLC.

The prototypes of the temple can be found in early Moscow architecture (Zvenigorod, ancient temples of the Trinity-Sergius Lavra).

The temple is small, compact with parish premises on the lower floor. Recommended for tight areas. The belfry is located above the main entrance.

Italian motives. Temple for 200 people

The building of the temple is rectangular in plan, three-part, pillarless, three-apse, with a technical basement. The large dome crowns the square of the prayer hall and passes into a slender octagonal drum in the style of the Italian Renaissance with a helmet-shaped top.

The vestibule zone is virtually absent, while a vast vestibule has been designed, where a staircase leading to the choirs and the belfry is located. At the same time, the layout provides for a compact volume of a candle shop.

The staircase to the basement is located in the side apse, which is convenient for access to the utility rooms directly from the altar (to the sacristy, pantries, bathroom, etc.).

Typical projects of churches for 300 parishioners

Collective image of old Russian architecture - variant II. Single-domed temple with three altar apses for 300 people

Designer - "MNIITEP".

The building of the temple is rectangular in plan, three-part, four-pillared, single-dome. The temple was designed without a belfry.

The main version of the facades with the completion of the circular or keeled zakomara.

A clear success of the project developers are variations of the volumetric solution of the temple on the theme of Novgorod architecture with two roof options: a gable (gable) type and a “trefoil” type with lowered corners.

Collective image of old Russian architecture - variant III. Single-domed temple with three altar apses for 300 people

Designer - "Mosproekt-3".

The building of the temple is rectangular in plan, three-part, four-column, one-domed, three-apse, one-altar. The temple was designed without a belfry.

The developers tried to create a temple in the style of K.A. Ton, in whose projects the echoes of Byzantium in the Old Russian interpretation are clearly visible.

Choirs are located on the mezzanine floor. In the basement of the temple, there are: a sacristy, utility rooms, a ventilation chamber, an electrical panel room.

Typical projects of churches for 500 parishioners

A collective image of old Russian architecture - option I. The five-domed church with three altar apses is designed for 500 people

Designer - "MNIITEP".

In appearance The temple is dominated by elements of the Vladimir-Suzdal school of church architecture.

The building of the temple is rectangular in plan with pronounced entrance groups, four pillars, five domes. The temple was designed without a belfry.

In the basement of the temple, there are: a sacristy, utility rooms, a ventilation chamber and an electrical panel room.

Designer - "Mosproekt-2".

The full version of the temple consists of 4 blocks-modules: the central part of the temple (tent), two side chapels and a vestibule-refectory part. The project provides for different layout options for these blocks.

The building of the temple has a cross-shaped plan. The height of the temple is 32 meters.

Open choirs - on the second tier. In the basement of the temple, there are: a sacristy, utility, technical and household premises. Above the porch there is a low belfry.

Designer - "Mosproekt-3".

The architectural design of the temple is based on the pseudo-Byzantine tradition of temple building. The building is three-part, four-pillar and one-apse. In plan, the temple is an equilateral Greek cross, around which a rectangle of the main volume is formed, the facades are solved identically, which creates a feeling of wholeness and completeness of the volume.

The temple is crowned with five helmet-shaped domes, of which the central one stands out in larger proportions. The central dome is placed on a round drum, framed by a number of windows, visually creating the effect of airiness and lightness of the dome, in comparison with the total volume of the temple. Small domes are a type of rotunda with an open colonnade. At the same time, belfries are located in two western small drums.

On the ground floor there are: an altar and a staircase leading to the sacristy, the middle part of the temple with the northern and southern aisles, a narthex with candle shop, an entrance vestibule and a staircase leading to the choir stalls, which are located on the mezzanine floor.

In the basement of the temple, there are: a sacristy, utility rooms, a ventilation chamber and an electrical panel room.

Typical project of a temple for 600 parishioners

Designer: - PROJECT+ LLC.

The external architecture is designed in the style great cathedrals XVI-XVII centuries. A distinctive feature of the project is the setting of the side domes of the five domes along the axes: west-east, north-south.

In the vestibule area and in the basement there are rooms that can accommodate parish services while the parish house is being built.

The space-planning solution includes the upper and lower temples, a “developed” basement and entrance groups with a central internal staircase. The detached bell tower represents a type of the Rostov belfry (in a reduced form) with an entrance gate to the territory of the complex, a security room and an individual heating point (ITP). In the upper tier - a three-span bell.

Is it possible to consider that the temples, which are being built in great numbers now in Russia, reflect the image of the resurgent Orthodoxy? The well-known church architect Andrey Anisimov thinks that this question cannot be answered unambiguously. On the one hand, the rapid construction of new churches throughout the country cannot but rejoice, on the other hand, the questions of the continuity of artistic traditions, adherence to style, canon, and even just a sense of proportion remain open.

- Who usually decides how it will look new temple?

In the best case - the rector, but, as a rule, the trustee tries to dictate his will. And if the customers have some idea about church architecture, about church art, then that's good. And if they do not have such ideas and they are based only on their own taste, which, moreover, was formed in Soviet time when churches were not built, then, of course, the situation is more complicated. But the architect can show his options and find some kind of compromise. The main problem is that church architecture is a young profession, and very often not only customers, but also the architects themselves are inexperienced.

Parishioners and clerics often complain that the new church is cramped, cold or stuffy, that the acoustics are poor; artists complain that they do not understand how modern temples, whose architecture is based on a synthesis of different traditions, can be painted from the inside ... Should all these wishes be taken into account when designing new church?

All that you listed is the misfortune of inexperienced architects who were pulled out of the design of some shopping complex and asked to build a temple on the occasion.

Of course, the main task of a temple builder is to organize the space conveniently; you should at least know where everything is located in the temple, how the service is going on, where the exclamation is coming from, what acoustics should be, what is happening in the altar and how much space should be there. I happened to see a project, created, by the way, by an academician, in which a spiral staircase around the throne led to the basement ...

Since any church art has a sacred meaning, every element of the external and internal decoration of the temple must be clearly thought out, right down to the door handle. That is, when a temple is being designed, it is already clear what kind of iconostasis will be there, what kind of murals, it is clear what style of music should be played there. For me, the ideal is our antiquity: icon painting, znamenny chant.

Temple architecture is a colossal separate area, for work in which you need to have very serious knowledge. An architect who encounters this for the first time is very self-confident. I myself went through all this - it seemed to me 25 years ago that I knew everything. Now I understand that I am only at the very beginning of the journey and with each project I learn more and more, something new and important.

And at first everything seems simple, and customers and architects rush into "creativity". And then after all, by these buildings, which were built on a whim, without understanding the harmony of the temple space, descendants will judge the spiritual culture of our era!

Is there a ready solution? For example, typical designs of temples that can be easily, quickly and inexpensively built?

Each time it is an individual project. There is tradition, diversity church architecture colossal, so it makes no sense to build something of the same type - this will not affect the complexity of the work and the cost.

By the way, when customers come to our workshop, we, as a rule, pleasantly surprise them: they discover so many different interesting architectural solutions that it becomes possible to think and choose a project depending on where the new temple will be, what will be initiation and who will go to it.

For example, the iconostasis. It may not necessarily be wooden or closed… So, now we have made an interior design for a church in the Patriarchal Center for the Spiritual Development of Children and Youth at the Danilov Monastery. Here we offered the customer an open iconostasis - after all, in this temple, beginners, youth will gather, and, of course, such an iconostasis will perform educational, missionary tasks.

It is good if the customer knows exactly what he wants, but this is rarely the case. The problem is that people have not just taste preferences, but stereotypes.

- That is, everyone who orders the construction of the temple wants the same thing? And what exactly?

For example, at one time everyone wanted a church similar to the one on Poklonnaya Hill. And this despite the fact that this project is not the most successful. But many people like that it looks like modern architecture - a lot of glass and concrete. But a church cannot have glass walls, otherwise how can one pray in it! The temple should be an enclosed space.

- And what is "fashionable" now?

As a rule, if a temple is built in a city, the local regional administration, together with sponsors, invest a lot of money there. After all, there are not enough temples in the province, and a new large cathedral is already like business card. And the authorities are trying to make it look as monumental and rich as possible. Therefore, marble, gold are welcome, and if there are not so many funds, then artificial marble and titanium nitride, which is even worse. For example, a golden cross on the background of a copper roof is perceived as a kind of accent, it crowns the building, but what if everything is covered with titanium nitride? When the whole roof is golden - this is already too much, some kind of logic, dramaturgy of space must be built ...

Typically, such large construction projects are entrusted to local construction organizations and architects. The governor can be understood: it is an honor if everything is done by local craftsmen. But the problem is that in principle there are very few church architects with experience, and it is all the more difficult to find a specialist in the provinces.

Under these conditions, the recommendation seems to me to be very correct. His Holiness Patriarch Cyril: "Let's be more modest." For example, when we built the Vladimir Skete on Valaam, there were funds, but they had to be spent wisely, so we decided to spend them not on the shine of the domes, not on marble luxury, but to make the temple more strict, brick, so that it fits into the surrounding northern landscape : a little carving, a little mosaic ... After all, the church is located in a monastic monastery. Wherein temple complex includes a cell building, and a baptismal, and many other premises necessary for the monks. It was necessary to create a living temple, and not just a monument - so we decided to spend the money on what is really needed.

It is a pity when there are all the possibilities, a lot of money has been spent, and the temple turns out to be indistinct. That is why, by the way, many parishioners do not like to visit such churches, they call them "remakes", they feel uncomfortable there. It should not be forgotten that the aesthetic impression of the church building is of great missionary importance.

But not every parish or city in the province can “complain” about the excess of money for the construction of temples.

The most important thing here is not the amount of money, but the fact that our desires coincide with our capabilities. No need to set a goal for 3 kopecks to build the Cathedral of Christ the Savior, you can not do cheap things with artificial gold glitter and fake diamonds. After all, even from inexpensive materials you can create a work of art.

Quality material suitable for the temple should be used. In my opinion, it cannot be concrete. It does not allow air and moisture to pass through, it is a cold material, it cools at night, and when people come to the temple during the day, the temperature rises, condensation forms. It is always stuffy in such a building: it is difficult to think over ventilation, it will require additional big money. That is, having come up with a temple from a “modern and inexpensive” material - concrete, we must come up with an effective heating and ventilation system for it, special paints for interior paintings to withstand condensation, and so on.

In a brick temple, which is painted with frescoes, the walls "breathe", absorb moisture, and then give it away for a long time: part - out, part - inside. Therefore, in ancient temples it is never very cold or very stuffy. So the architectural tradition here does not just perform aesthetic functions - following it helps to solve many practical problems, those who come to the temple to pray to be comfortable in this room.

Therefore, for little money, you can make a temple that will meet certain necessary requirements: it must be roomy, warm, but most importantly - it must be a temple.

If we talk about inexpensive materials, then you can use gas silicate blocks, which have all the characteristics of a brick, but they are cheaper. Most of all, we are looking for materials that are used in the restoration. Cement is evil for the temple.

Using such traditional methods, you can build a small temple even for 5-6 million rubles (excluding the cost of communications) and 2.5 months of work - and you can immediately serve there.

Now we are developing just such a “line” of budget temples. Their principle is easy and fast construction, as long-term construction squeezes out huge amounts of money.

- Can you name any specific successful projects, looking at which descendants will not condemn us?

Maybe this is a new temple in the Zachatievsky Monastery in Moscow. At least for the capital, where in general a lot of very different things are being built, this is a successful work in which old traditions are combined with modern technologies. This cathedral fits well into the architecture of the center of Moscow.

In general, just ten years ago, I could not have answered this question - what was being built then can hardly be called masterpieces, especially in the outback. Now some interesting architectural projects are gradually emerging.

Unfortunately, there is no such tradition now that architectural workshops exist under the Church; perhaps such centralization would be useful. Then there would be a single center that could analyze and streamline all the heterogeneous processes that take place in temple building.

- But you said that standard projects are impossible?

Of course, there is no need for typical ones ... But you can somehow set the direction, distribute orders to those who can handle them better. Maybe I'm wrong, but personally I want to somewhat limit the flight of the builders' imagination, because now, just having a desire, you can build anything ...

This year, Moscow Architectural Institute is finally going to open training in the specialty "Temple-builder"; this new undertaking is followed with hope by all architects.

In previous eras, art was dominated by one style. How can you characterize the style of today's temple architecture?

I don't know if modern secular architecture exists in Russia. But, in any case, I can say for sure that its laws do not apply to temple building. We cannot use modern techniques in it, the same high-tech. After all temple architecture built on symbolism. Her tasks are different. Therefore, for me as an architect, it makes no sense to look for unusual innovative techniques that would break with tradition.

In my tastes, I rely on ancient samples. For example, I will not build a church in the style of classicism or baroque.

What style dominates modern temple building? Most likely none. Often this is the self-expression of architects or customers, which has nothing to do with church tradition. There are several architects who are constantly involved in temple construction - there is already something to see. After all, if knowledge, practical experience appear, and even if the architect himself becomes churched, he already begins to live in this tradition.

Nobody has a common concept. Everyone does it differently. Yes, and I myself can, for example, make a project in the Art Nouveau style, or in the style of the 17th century, or in the style of Byzantine architecture. This is not because I have porridge in my head, but because it's all my favorite. Depends on the situation, location, dedication, purpose, history of the temple.

- Is there a canon in architecture as in icon painting?

As such, there is no written canon. There are instructions in Scripture what the temple should be, they are given by God Himself: how to build the Tabernacle. It is said that there must be a temple itself, that there must be an altar, a holy of holies, there must be a porch, a courtyard, and so on. This is dogmatic. Everything else is tradition. Our task is to choose from this tradition that which belongs specifically to the tradition, and not to the tastes that prevailed in a given period of time. That is, for example, churches of the era of classicism or baroque are closer to secular architecture. In a baroque iconostasis, for example, you will not be able to see the icons behind the decorative elements - at that time, architects were more interested in style than sacred meaning every detail of the interior.

But, for example, if we look at a Byzantine temple, we will not find anything superfluous in architecture - everything is subject to a certain symbolism. Moreover, if this is royal architecture, then it is monumental, there is gold, and mosaics, and marble. But there are also simple small temples; remember, for example, the Balkans - and there, too, the space is organized surprisingly harmoniously.

In any church art, the main thing is proportion, because proportions emphasize the beauty of the form. After all, a church building should be beautiful. It can be simple, but it must also be beautiful. Any small Balkan temple, which is 3 by 4 meters in area, is very beautiful.

- Shouldn't the Russian tradition of small wooden rural churches be continued?

It was natural and easy to build a wooden temple in an ancient Karelian village. The necessary material was at hand, and the craftsmen, who were excellent at their craft, passed it on from generation to generation.

Now a forest with a diameter of 36 cm already has to be ordered almost through the Government of Russia, and the builders no longer master the techniques of wooden temple building - then one must look for restoration specialists, of which there are only a few. Such a “correct” wooden temple will cost the same as a stone one. But to build from "pencils" - rounded timber, from which summer cottages and bathhouses are built? .. Yes, temples cannot be built from them, this is no longer architecture! Of course, now such options are being built only as temporary ones: these buildings are ugly, short-lived, and the fire hazard is high.

The creation of “walking distance” temples in different districts of Moscow, which will be built from modules, is being widely discussed. The idea itself does not raise questions, but how can you evaluate the idea from the point of view of architecture?

If these are modules, then this is concrete ... True, I have not seen these projects personally, so I can’t judge.

Prefabricated temples are easy to implement; for example, now we are building a temple on Leninsky Prospekt, it is almost ready in 2.5 months.

You can quickly build small churches - at least following the example of Pskov architecture, which is impossibly simple, but surprisingly spiritual.

For me, the huge city churches with a capacity of 1.5 thousand people are not very clear. Clearly, if this Cathedral. But church life to organize in it, to create a community is difficult. People have come and gone, and the priest is unable to communicate with everyone. It will no longer be parishioners, but visitors.

Now there are very few churches in the multi-million metropolis. In our Moscow churches on Sundays and holidays there is nowhere for an apple to fall, and on weekdays 10-15 people come to services there. A huge temple is expensive to maintain. That is, the whole week it is necessary to heat the temple in order to have a service there on Sunday. And then the utility bills come in and everyone gets sick.

But to fill Moscow with a huge number of small churches - that would be great. There, the priest will be able to organize a small, but a community, he will be able to feed each parishioner.

Many urban residents believe that the architecture of the temple should fit into the surrounding urban development. Is it reasonable, in your opinion?

It depends on what building. Sometimes in the same Moscow there is such urban modern architecture that you don’t want to live in it, let alone push a temple building into it, and even customize its style to suit it. On the contrary, I believe that the church building should look like a garden of Eden in the midst of all this. That is, the temple should not be faked as an industrial landscape, but be a counterpoint. Such a Church, as it were, says: there is a worldly life, and there is a church life, and if you want such a life, come here. That is, all architectural refinements should emphasize, and not obscure, the symbolic image of the temple and the territory adjacent to it. For example, in the Sretensky Monastery, the temple is surrounded by a garden. And this is not so arranged because the governor, Father Tikhon, loves roses, this is how it should be - as an image of the Garden of Eden in the center of Moscow.

You talked about the architecture of Byzantium and Holy Russia as a model that needs to be copied. But, for example, the Art Nouveau style, which arose at the beginning of the XX century, also implemented ancient patterns, but the artists then built truly innovative temples.

Art Nouveau style, in which, for example, the Marfo-Mariinsky Convent in Moscow was built and to which A.V. Shchusev and I.E. Bondarenko is an example of beautiful church architecture. Why was he successful? Because the artists studied Pskov and Novgorod, studied antiquity, primordial traditions... After all, it was in that era, at the beginning of the 20th century, that the understanding came that our traditional heritage is very rich and interesting. And then they began to focus not on the West, as it had been for several centuries, starting with Peter I, but on their own art.

An artificial search for something new is a pernicious business. For example, an icon painter does not sign his work - he is not its author. Similarly, an architect, creating a new building, must each time study the ancient samples and, having already passed them through himself, create his own project. This process for me is always the most enjoyable part of the job. It gives my skill and my soul so much more than if I were just expressing myself as a terribly talented architect.

- Do you think that the ideas of the "Russian Renaissance" of the early XX centuries are consonant with our era?

Now many artists feel in the same state - they still have to study, discover, copy a lot. Then only they will be able to create within the framework of tradition. But, for example, the new generation of architects, who are now 20-22 years old, are already moving on - I see this in the example of my students. So, for example, I saw projects of temples in an innovative style, but which were created not just for the purpose of self-expression, but on the basis of a deep understanding Orthodox traditions: forms remain there, the proportions of the "golden section", the construction on four pillars, with a drum and cupolas, that is, a cross-dome system. But such architecture can only be created by believers who know the life of the Church.

In Russia, all church art is extremely conservative, and the architecture of churches is no exception. Experiments are unacceptable, everything is done according to the classical canons, and any deviation is perceived with hostility. Catholic Church much more progressive in this respect. Remember, for example, according to the project of the postmodernist Mario Botta, or. There are many such examples, often churches become architectural landmarks, and even new symbols of the city in which they are built.

Recently, I came across an interesting project: they want to turn an abandoned TV tower in Yekaterinburg into a church. Pretty bold. What do you think?

The project of the church was proposed by the architectural workshop "PTARH and Partners". According to its employees, the church of St. Catherine is best placed in an abandoned TV tower.

Anatoly Ptashnik, director of the workshop:

"We developed these sketches on our own initiative, because something needs to be done with the TV tower. We have two concepts. Either it will be a temple, or a religious and cultural center, that is, in addition to the temple, there will be concert hall, forum, exhibition space. This work was done to continue and unite the discussions about the fate of the TV tower and the Church of St. Catherine in order to come to some kind of consensus about these significant objects.

The architect believes that the temple located in the TV tower will become an excellent high-rise dominant. At the same time, he declares that he is ready for discussions on this topic.

According to another project, the temple was proposed to be built in the water area of ​​the City Pond. But this location has caused a lot of controversy among the locals. And the idea of ​​building a temple in the TV tower, according to Ptashnik, on the contrary, should unite everyone.

This is the first version of the project.

And this is the second one.

Temples, churches, cathedrals are complex objects of construction. Their design, like any other buildings, is carried out according to certain standards and norms. To take into account all the nuances, as well as to avoid mistakes, professionals should carry out the development of the temple project.

The Mosproekt company offers ready-made solutions for churches, other buildings and structures from experienced engineers. We also carry out design according to the technical specifications of the customer. More details in the section "".

Types of temples

According to the type of material from which they are built

• Stone
• Wooden

By design type:

• Cross-domed

They are rectangular in terms of construction. The architectural elements gradually descend from the central dome, forming a pyramidal composition. From above, the building forms a shape in the form of a cross.

• Tent

The main feature is the roof in the form of a tetrahedral or polyhedral pyramid, resembling a tent in appearance.

• Longline

Sections are placed on top of each other in several floors and gradually decrease upwards.

• Rotunda churches

In plan they are round buildings. These are cylindrical buildings crowned with a dome.

Churches also vary in size.:

• Less than 200 people
• From 500 to 1000 parishioners
• Over 1000 people

What is a typical project?

This is a set of ready-made documentation with drawings, diagrams, specifications, which can be used several times. That is, building plans that have been tested by time, construction and several customers. The use of a standard project requires less time to pass the state examination, and besides, it is cheaper than an individual solution.

What does it consist of:

1. General plan
2. Explanatory note
3. Architectural, space-planning, constructive solutions
4. Engineering communications schemes

Maintenance and revision

Our specialists accompany the project at all stages of its implementation. In addition, engineers are always ready to finalize the proposed solution at the request of the customer, to make changes in accordance with accepted standards and construction norms. After that, we also help to pass the state examination of the amended documentation.

Norms to which the project complies

1. SP 31-103-99 “Buildings, structures and complexes of Orthodox churches”
2. MDS 31-9.2003 “Orthodox churches”
3. Standard ABOK-2-2004 “Orthodox churches. Heating, ventilation, air conditioning”

Order a project in Mosproekt

There are three main ways to purchase a temple project.

The second is to write to our mail: [email protected] website

Project for reuse.

The cost of the finished project of the “Construction part of the project”: sections of the GP (general plan), AR (architectural solutions), KZh (reinforced concrete structures), KM (metal structures), taking into account landing on the general plan, is 50,000 rubles.

The cost of changes in the design of the dome, the bell tower at the request of the customer - from 50,000 rubles.

Engineering sections: EO (electric lighting) and OB (heating and ventilation) are included as a gift without changes. When designing external networks and changes in the project for engineering sections, the price must be specified.

The quality and scope of the design work can be seen on YouTube, the links on this page are below.

The cost of the "Construction part of the project" of a completely new temple, approximately the same area - from 170,000 rubles. When ordering a new project - a preliminary design and a 3D model as a gift. If it is necessary to design engineering sections and a construction organization project (COS), the price must be specified.

The temple is three-domed cruciform in plan. There is a ready-made option with a basement.
On the ground floor (mark 0.000) there is a prayer hall of the temple, a vestibule, a staircase with access to the choirs and a bell tower, (mark 0.360) in the eastern part of the temple there is an altar with a sacristy and a sacristy.
On the second floor (mark 4.700) there are service rooms and a gallery for the choir. There is an option with a balcony.
At around 9.000 there is a bell tower.
The height of the central dome to the cross is 20.7 m.
The height of the bell tower to the cross is 18.6 m.

Facades south and west.

East facade.

Plan at 0.000.

Plan at around 4,700 (mezzanine).

Incision.

TECHNICAL AND ECONOMIC INDICATORS

No. p / p	Name	Unit of measurement	Quantity	Note
	Built-up area Temple priest's house	m 2 m 3	176 ,0
	total area Temple priest's house	m 2 m 3	200 ,0
	Building volume Temple priest's house	m 3 m 3	1680
	Estimated capacity	parishioners
	The area of ​​the developed site	ha	0,1476

The composition of the project.

	Name	Designation	Note
	General explanatory note.
	General plan.		Drawing set
	temple building
	architectural solutions.		Drawing set
	Reinforced concrete structures.		Drawing set
	Metal structures.		Drawing set
			Drawing set
	Electric lighting is internal.		Drawing set
	priest's house
	Architectural and construction solutions.		Drawing set
	Heating and ventilation and air conditioning.		Drawing set
	Electrical lighting inside the priest's house.		Drawing set
	Water supply and sewerage.		Drawing set
	Construction organization project. Metal structures If you are interested in the temple and you wish to build it, as well as make changes to the project in the form of increasing or decreasing the area, the height of the bell tower, choir, altar, porch, basement and any other changes, we will fulfill all possible wishes for you. If you did not find the desired project of the temple on the pages of the site, then we suggest using the link to select the style from the "Architectural Encyclopedia of Baranovsky".