Help on Tele2, tariffs, questions

In one breath I read the book by Zenon Kosidovsky, a Polish historian, "Tales of the Evangelists", 1979. Of course, something in the book is outdated, something new data has appeared. But on the whole, this book cannot be called anything other than a cover-up.

First of all, it should be said that the indicated authors of the 4 canonical gospels are not the indicated authors. Who wrote these books is unknown. And this is recognized even by the official church, saying that their creators are "holy authors." With an extremely high degree of certainty, we can say that the authors of these books did not personally know Jesus of Nazareth, and their books are compilations from various written and oral sources.
It is rather difficult to understand how "sacred" books that have almost nothing to do with reality and contradict themselves and each other in many things can be considered.

The church believes that the first gospel was the Gospel of Matthew, but it is known that chronologically the first was the Gospel of Mark, it appeared somewhere in 50-70 AD. The text from Mark is the most sane with the least amount of fantasies and gag.

For more than 40 years after the crucifixion of Jesus, no one wrote anything about him, but various legends and traditions roamed. The gospels were constantly modified to suit political, theological, opportunistic interests. Moreover, these changes can be traced quite clearly. The value and sacredness of these texts as biographical and relevant to history, given these factors, tends to almost zero.

Basically, at first the Gospels were corrected and adjusted to fit the prophecies. old testament in order to win the sympathy of the Jews (sometimes there are almost direct quotes). Significant changes later arose in order to popularize Christianity among other nationalities and confessions.

So what was and what wasn't.

• The whole story about the birth of Jesus is most likely just made up. In the Old Testament it was written that the prophet would be born in Bethlehem, Luke and Matthew wrote that he would be born in Bethlehem. Mark knows nothing about this. It was written that he would visit Israel - Luke came up with the beating of babies by Herod, Matthew - the census. It was written that he was the blood of the blood and the flesh of the flesh of David - please - Joseph, they say, a relative of David. For this, by the way, and Bethlehem, because David was from there.


• Then, by the way, a gorgeous pulp arose due to the fact that they came up with immaculate conception Mary. And the problem arose, if Jesus in this case was conceived by God, then he is no longer flesh from the flesh of David. Later it was thought that Mary was a close relative of Joseph.
  The deification of Mary appeared because a number of Eastern peoples could not imagine their life without the cult of the Great Mother. Evangelists did not write much about her, since traditionally for Jews (and not only for them) at that time a woman was a secondary being in relation to a man.


• Magi kings are also from the prophecies of the Old Testament.


• The very date of birth is confused, most likely he was born earlier.


• Jesus' birthday - December 25 - is pure fiction. This holiday, since the pagans celebrated the cult rising sun and at this time no one worked and everyone rested. Christian leaders decided that it would be a good thing to celebrate the birthday of Christ on this day. For several more centuries, many celebrated the cult of the rising sun.


• Luke's moment about 12-year-old Jesus in the church in Jerusalem. Most likely borrowed from the biography of the famous historian Josephus Flavius. In other words, nothing is known or understood about what Jesus did until about 30 years of age.


• The story of the brothers and sisters of Jesus. They most likely really were. 4 brothers and 2 sisters. But since this cast a shadow on the subsequent purity of Mary (who began to be promoted as mother of god in the 2nd century AD), stuffing began that they were cousins, that these were not the children of Mary, but her sisters and so on. Mark, Luke and Matthew knew nothing about this and wrote simply - brothers and sisters of Jesus.


• Judgment of the Sanhedrin over Jesus aka "The Jews killed their messiah!!11" This whole story and its gradual modification is a perfect example of political and opportunistic changes. In general, if briefly, the Sanhedrin court (ie the Jewish court of the high priests) most likely did not judge Jesus at all. He was immediately tried exclusively by a Roman court and executed by the Roman method - crucifixion. The Jews used other methods of execution. Pilate was not kind and did not try to save Jesus. Yes, the high priests most likely contributed to the Roman court, since Jesus, as a potential leader of the uprising and various riots, was clearly not beneficial to them, but subsequently the emphasis was greatly shifted and that's why. During the period of writing the Gospels, it was beneficial for Christians to dissociate themselves to a certain extent from the Jews and at the same time show loyalty to the Romans, to prove that this was not a destructive phenomenon for the authorities, and that, on the contrary, the Romans themselves favored the Christians. Hence the ever-increasing kindness of Pilate, and the ever more atrocious Jews with each successive Gospel.


• Jesus did not particularly recognize the rite of baptism and most likely did not baptize anyone himself. This rite itself is originally pagan. Why was he later introduced into Christianity - to attract pagans.


• The whole story with Judas was most likely invented and he was not a traitor at all. This is indirectly confirmed by the "Acts of the Apostles", the most early book(written before the gospels), describing the events after the crucifixion. It is there that it is written about the resurrection of Jesus, that he met with all the apostles. There is not a word about betrayal, Judas, his suicide.


• Just a crucifix. It was highly likely. Since it was a humiliating and shameful way to kill a person at that time, it is unlikely that the evangelists who embellished the life of Jesus would have written about it if it had not been. Rather, on the contrary, they tried to "make a plus out of a minus" and ennoble and give this crucifix a high meaning, as well as competently shift the emphasis.


• Resurrection of Christ. A murky topic, in fact, is one of the keys of religion, as Paul writes in his Epistle to the Corinthians, saying that if there was no resurrection, then our whole religion is nonsense. Slightly less than completely, the idea is again borrowed from the prophecies of the Old Testament, which hints. The very moment with the lid of the coffin thrown back, the appearance of Mary Magdalene there, etc. - is also an excellent example of the growing polemic with opponents of the fact of the resurrection. With each Gospel, more and more details appeared, convincing that the body was not stolen, but that Jesus was resurrected, that it was not a vision, not a spirit, namely a real man from flesh and blood (hence, by the way, the story about Thomas the unbeliever), etc.


• The story of Lazarus was invented by John a little less than completely.


• With a high degree of probability, Jesus preached only for the Jews, "the lost sheep of the house of Israel", he called the Gentiles dogs, he advised not to go to the Samaritans. Multiculturalism was invented by Paul, as well as many other things, in fact he created his own religion, for which the Jews did not like him.


• By the way, the mother and the brothers did not suspect anything about the holiness of their relative and considered him crazy, which caused Jesus himself severe suffering.

Of course, as a preacher, Jesus was a significant reformer for his time, he spoke of social equality, fought corruption with the absurd, soulless formalism of the Pharisees, sympathized with the poor and the destitute.

P.S. I'm far from a conspiracy theory. One gets the impression after reading that there was no global plan, and all this was thought up on the go.
P.P.S. By the way, if someone can advise something more modern and equally sane on this topic, I'm waiting for links in the comments.

Preface.

Therefore by their fruits you shall know them.

Not everyone who says to Me: “Lord, Lord!” will enter the Kingdom of Heaven, but he who does the will of My Father in Heaven.

Many will say to Me in that day: Lord! God! Have we not prophesied in Your name? and did they not cast out demons in your name? and did not many miracles work in your name?

And then I will declare to them: I never knew you; depart from Me, you workers of iniquity.

Gospel of Matthew 7:20-23

I bring to your attention a very interesting publication, which contains unique photographs of one extremely important document. This document should be familiar to every patriot of Russia.

______________________________________________________

How the Russian Orthodox Church captures Tambov

Metropolitan of Tambov and Rasskazovsky Theodosius. Photo: Tambov diocese

The life of the Tambov diocese is very hard. So unsweetened that Metropolitan Theodosius of Tambov even decided to write a letter to the governor of the Tambov region. Thank you for giving us two new monasteries, the metropolitan says, but we still have a huge list of unresolved problems. And the insolent city authorities do not want to help, they do not take us seriously. And then a fascinating list of requests of 26 items. Enjoy ;)

Vice Governor Natalya Astafieva responded to the Metropolitan's requests as a faithful member of the Orthodox flock.

“For each topic mentioned in the appeal, it is necessary to appoint responsible persons, develop the most optimal solution, and develop a joint action plan. Systems approach taking into account budgetary resources, as well as with the attraction of sponsorship funds, it will allow, within the framework of church-state interaction ... to make Tambov and its environs better and more beautiful, will allow to restore the connection between times and generations.

That is, some residents of Tambov can already slowly prepare for the fact that the houses in which they live and the schools in which their children study will be taken away by the church in the name of restoring the connection between times and generations.

https://varlamov.ru/2625330.html

______________________________________

In fact, there were no attacks on the ROC in that article: I simply stated the facts from which absolutely unambiguous conclusions flowed. Only and everything. A if the facts look like attacks, then this is the best characteristic for those who are responsible for these facts.

The same applies to the facts stated in Varlamov's publication (regardless of the attitude towards Varlamov himself). Facts are stubborn things. With such activities, the ROC no longer needs any attacks and discrediting.

How to relate to such activities of the Tambov diocese? And is this only happening in Tambov? Alas, no, this happens not only in Tambov, this happens all over the country. Isaac, I believe, is on everyone's lips.

A brief excursion into history.

Some may ask: how did the ROC come to such a life? Is such activity the general policy of the ROC or is it "abuse on the ground"?

The answer to many things is given by the speech of Patriarch Kirill in 2013 on the 1025th anniversary of the baptism of Rus', in which he said that the spiritual revival of Russia began 25 years ago (for those who are interested, they can read about it).

I think everyone knows what happened then (that is, 25 years ago from 2013) - Gorbachev's "perestroika". For the people it was a disaster, "perestroika" ended with the destruction of the USSR. Almost 300 million people lost their homeland - the USSR. A sharp impoverishment of the people, bloody conflicts and local wars, banditry and other horrors accompanied the collapse of the USSR.

But for whom is the war, for whom is the mother. For millions of people, "perestroika" and the collapse of the USSR is a great tragedy and catastrophe, but for the church it is happiness and the beginning of Russia's spiritual rebirth.

Calling the time of "perestroika" the beginning of the spiritual revival of Russia, Patriarch Kirill showed himself in all his glory. And since none of the supreme hierarchs of the Russian Orthodox Church objected to him, it turns out that the Russian Orthodox Church agrees that “perestroika” is the beginning of the spiritual revival of Russia.

As they say, in truth by their fruits you will know them . This is really very important to know.

The collapse of the USSR brought enormous suffering to the peoples. But on the ruins of the Great Power formed on the site of the USSR, they came to power greedy people. Property, which was the property of the whole people, became the property of a handful of rich people who robbed the people.

And which side did the Church take? Robbers or robbed? Alas, robbers. It is a fact.

Moreover, the ROC not only took the side of the robbers - the Church, together with the blood-sucking oligarchs, began to tear the tormented country to pieces, tearing out fatter pieces, taking advantage of the fact that weak disunited people cannot protect themselves and their property. The church continues to rob and rob those who have already been robbed and robbed.

The "servants of God" from the Russian Orthodox Church turned out to be grabbers, completely devoid of conscience, sympathy and compassion, like the worst of the robbers. And the Russian Orthodox Church hypocritically tries to justify its heinous deeds by “service to God”, “fulfillment of the will of God”, “restoration of historical justice”.

What we see: the leadership of the Russian Orthodox Church bathes in luxury, at the same time that millions of robbed people are below the poverty line, in poverty.

By the way, the price of each of these miters significantly exceeds 100 thousand rubles. Multiply, count. And that's just the hats...

If these “servants of God” really believed that Jesus Christ would come to judge the living and the dead, would expect the resurrection of the dead and the life of the future age, would they have so boldly violated and trampled not only the commandments of God, but also elementary human decency? Moreover, this applies to those who occupy high positions in the church hierarchy - after all, to whom more is given, more will be asked.

The fact that the ministers of the church do their vile deeds, hiding behind the name of God, says, moreover, it says quite unequivocally about one thing: the ministers of the Russian Orthodox Church themselves do not believe in God, otherwise they would not have acted like this .

I already wrote about this in my article “The whole truth about the canonization of Nicholas II”.

Well, the Bible gives a clear answer about the fate of such "servants of God."

Then he will also say to those on the left side: Depart from me, cursed, into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels:

for I was hungry, and you gave me no food; I was thirsty, and you did not give Me drink;

I was a stranger, and they did not receive me; was naked, and they did not clothe me; sick and in prison, and did not visit me.

Then they too will say to Him in answer: Lord! when did we see you hungry, or thirsty, or a stranger, or naked, or sick, or in prison, and did not serve you?

Then he will answer them, “Truly, I say to you, because you did not do it to one of the least of these, you did not do it to Me.”

And these shall go away into eternal punishment, but the righteous into eternal life.

Gospel of Matthew (25:41-46)

And now let's remember what the Bolsheviks, cursed by the Russian Orthodox Church, did when they were in power. One can talk a lot about the benefits that the Bolsheviks gave to the people, about those benefits that the people in the Russian Empire could not even dream of.

I will cite only a few of them.

It was truly a miracle: unemployment was eliminated in the USSR, poverty was eliminated, everyone could receive free medical care, even apartments were given free of charge.

And the Bible says this too:

Then the King will say to those on his right hand, Come, you blessed of my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world:

for I was hungry, and you gave me food; I was thirsty, and you gave Me drink; I was a stranger, and you accepted Me;

was naked, and you clothed me; I was sick and you visited Me; I was in prison, and you came to Me.

Then the righteous will answer Him: Lord! when we saw you hungry and fed you? or thirsty, and drink?

when we saw you as a stranger and received you? or naked and clothed?

when did we see you sick, or in prison, and come to you?

And the King will answer them, “Truly, I say to you, because you did it to one of the least of these My brothers, you did it to Me.”

Gospel of Matthew (25:34-40)

And one more important fact. An illiterate, uneducated person is easier to deceive, easier to make a slave, easier to rob. That is why the bloodsuckers-exploiters in the Russian Empire opposed public education in every possible way.

What is happening with education now? The terrible degradation of the sphere of education and the increasing dominance of priests in schools. Predators in power and ecclesiastical predators work hand in hand, with mutual benefit.

How did it work Soviet authority? The Soviet state needed educated, versatile developed people, free People-Creators. Therefore, education, science and culture took off in Soviet time to an unattainable height, which still causes black envy and hatred both among the current government and among the ministers of the Russian Orthodox Church.

You can't do anything without Me!

There is something else very important. The Bible quotes the words of the Lord: « You can't do anything without Me!" (John 15:5)

And what do we see now? Complete devastation and degradation everywhere: in industry, and in agriculture, and in science and education. What is the demographic situation in Russia? The people are dying.

What does it say? Yes, that there is no God's blessing on the current government and on the current servants of the Russian Orthodox Church, therefore everything is degrading and in such a terrible decline. And no temples built on the loot and the squeezed, built at the cost of blood, tears and grief of millions of people, will not deserve the mercy of God.

And what happened in the USSR? The country developed at an unprecedented pace, especially during the years of the first Stalin five-year plans. Such a rapid, rapid growth of industry has not known the entire history of the world.

And 12 years after the worst of the wars, the USSR had already launched the world's first artificial satellite into space.

So feel the difference: where was God's spark and God's blessing, and where it is not and cannot be.

So the current authorities and ministers of the church come out with black envy and are angry: they want to repeat successes at least in something, but they cannot, they want to show that God is with them, but it turns out devastation and degradation, thorns and thistles.

And we also know this: the devil and his servants cannot do anything, they can only slander and slander what has been done with the blessing of God. And when we see and hear yet another slander and slinging of everything Soviet from the current government and church ministers, we must understand this. The devil is the father of lies, and it is precisely in lies that the current authorities and their allies, the servants of the Russian Orthodox Church, succeed.

Question and answer.

How is it, the author, why do you write such things, because the Bolsheviks are materialists, they deny the existence of God, and here it turns out that they are the righteous, and not the servants of the Church, the servants of God? It turns out that the Bolsheviks, who deny God, are closer to Him than the servants of God, who revere Him?

It is useful for those who ask such questions to imagine such a situation.

You see this situation over and over again. A cruel and unprincipled band of robbers kills, tortures, robs people, and commits various cruelties and indecencies. And while the robbers say that all this is done for the glory such and such .

And how do you go about it such and such will you relate? Think.

It's the same with the church. No need to think that there was silence, smoothness, and God's grace, and then the evil Bolsheviks came and turned off faith in God, like a light bulb in a room. Nothing like this.

The people simply saw what the ministers of the church were doing, hiding behind the name of God, and made a natural conclusion in such a situation. That's all.

Then, somewhere in the middle of the 50s, the memory of generations, unfortunately, began to be lost. And people no longer understood why the Bolsheviks got so angry at the kind and meek "servants of God."

Well, the lesson of history, alas, was not learned. And everything happened again. And we saw the "servants of God" in all its glory.

Came from afar93

“And you will rule over many nations,
and they won't be over you"
Isaiah.

I will be brief

Have you ever wondered if there is a God at all? Do you personally believe in God? There are a lot of religions in the world, some of them intersect in some way, but they all mutually exclude each other, that is, they contradict! It turns out that only one of them is true. But how to choose the right one, among the many false ones? -you ask. Maybe everything is thanks to the Big Bang and Darwinian evolution, there is no God, and we are from monkeys ?? And suddenly there is no truth in any religion.

Think about why so many different religions. And I'll tell you why! Then to divide the people!

Read the Bible carefully, there are so many contradictions in it. Here is an example: a quote from the prophecy of Solomon: “For if this righteous man is the son of God, then God will protect him and deliver him from the hand of enemies ...”, and here is a quote from the prophecy of Isaiah: “The Lord laid on Him the sins of us all ... But the Lord was pleased smite him, and he gave him over to torment.” The sayings are completely opposite!

In Solomon, God protects his messenger, and all people are responsible for the sins themselves. And in Isaiah, God sends his Messiah to death and torment, and even “hangs” people’s sins on him, well ... after such words, the Orthodox will cut my throat. And what is the prophecy from God??) If the prophecy of Isaiah, then it turns out that God is not the kind guy we were told about: And here is another well-known quote from Deuteronomy chapter 28: do not give, but give to a stranger, and you will rule over many peoples, but they will not be over you.” Is that what God said?

I do not think that God encouraged usury and the exaltation of one people over another. I'm not an atheist, but I don't believe in religion. Yes, I believe that such a person Jesus Christ lived, he preached his doctrine, he had many followers and disciples. I still believe that envious people crucified him on the cross, and maybe even due to some reasons I do not understand, he was resurrected. But this is where my faith runs out!

Prophet Moses, what did he do? He led people for 40 years through the desert, which could be circumvented on foot in a week! And after that he inspired people that he had revelations from above ... a conversation with God? Do you just think so? No, he was in complete control of the situation! He knew that in 40 years a generation would change that would not know what was before him. He also knew that people are exhausted (you won’t live long on manna from heaven) and are ready to do anything to get out of the desert and believe even the most ridiculous! So he presented his “revelations” to people. I am sure that the books of the Bible were not written by the followers of Christ. Jesus was quite popular in his time, he was loved, after his death, some people took his teaching and very cleverly added their thoughts there, as if between the lines. The question is: Why did they do it? And they just wanted to rule the world, again unstructured! Consider what religion is. And this, I tell you, is a whole ideology with its own worldview and a number of rules. This is a powerful structure for manipulating people. True believers are ready for anything!

If there was only one religion, then people would be united. But since the rulers of this world do not need unity (otherwise, look, the people will unite and overthrow us), they created many religions to divide people!

I'm not saying that religion is so bad. At least it keeps the people within certain limits. But nevertheless it is necessary to distinguish between what is true and what is false! In addition, there is a certain hierarchy in churches and monasteries. You come there and must first confess to the priest, and then the priest will convey your repentance to God and ask forgiveness for you. Absolute absurdity! How is everyone equal before God? Why go to church, learn some prayers, stand with a candle or confess to a priest? Why all these rituals and priests? Can't a simple person take and talk with God if everyone is equal before him? And then Father Pop can, but you can’t.

For reference: not the Bible, but the Koran more truthfully reflects the essence of God. And what, by the way, then is God, if not a guy sitting in heaven? Do you know what pantheism is? That's pretty much what I want to say. God is a comprehensive universe, a kind of energy entity that radiates vibrations and influences everything that happens in the world. Like this! And you can’t go to your grandmother without any Christianity, Buddhism, Judaism ... It’s easy to get in touch with God, you just need to live in harmony with the world, nature and other people.

p.s. This article reflects the personal opinion of the author, and is not the opinion of the project owners.

How to strengthen your faith in God?

The baptism of Rus' is great historical event, which is considered to be very progressive for its time. It is believed that by getting rid of paganism and voluntarily embarking on the path of Christianity, the Russian people did the only thing right choice. However, was everything as rosy and easy as it is described in history books? How planted new religion and why was it done? How did paganism transform into Orthodoxy?

The answers to these questions will make you take a fresh look at the history of our state. The impetus for writing this article in the genre of "historical investigation" was information from the books of the writer Anastasia Novykh, which clearly states that the planting of Christianity took place "with fire and sword", and that the new religion was nothing more than an attempt by Prince Vladimir to assert his sole power, with which the ancient pagan beliefs could not cope. Is there any confirmation of this information in historical science? It turns out there is. According to the official version of history, Orthodoxy came to Rus' from Byzantium during the reign of Prince Vladimir the Red Sun in 988. However, there are still many questions about the concept and term "Orthodoxy".

Modern historians note that the concepts of "Christianity" and "Orthodoxy" are not identical. For example, modern philosophical dictionary gives the following definition of Orthodoxy: “The Slavic equivalent of orthodoxy (Greek Ortodoxia - correct knowledge). The term was first used in the 2nd century as opposed to heterodoxia (Greek Geterodoxia - delusion of heretics). Orthodoxy means strict adherence to any doctrine, orthodoxy. According to these data, Orthodoxy = orthodoxy = orthodoxy. Another definition from the Old Slavonic dictionary, compiled according to the annals of the 10-11th centuries.

It is interesting that in this dictionary there is no word "Orthodoxy", but there is "orthodoxy", which means: "true, right faith." So what kind of "right faith" came to Rus' in 988?

In 988 there was still a single church and a single Christianity. The division of Christianity into Roman Catholic and Greek Catholic (orthodox) occurred only 60 years later - in 1054. The final choice in favor of the eastern christian church in Rus' was made much later.

But what did “Orthodoxy” mean in Rus', and when was it first mentioned? One of the first sources is the chronicle of the Byzantine monk Belisarius, written in 532, long before the baptism of Rus'. Belisarius unequivocally calls our ancestors "Orthodox Slovenes and Rusyns." So what did the word "Orthodoxy" really mean in those days? It's very simple: Slovenes and Rusyns were Orthodox, because they "praised the Rule", which is quite obvious from the etymology of the word itself.

Recall that Rule in the pagan Slavic religion is the world of the ancient Slavic gods!

The substitution of the terms "Orthodox" and "Orthodoxy" occurred only in the 17th century, when the Moscow Patriarch Nikon carried out the famous church reform. The main goal of this reform was not at all to change the rites of the Christian church, as it is now interpreted.

Surely every person who studied the history of this reform had a natural question: what was the meaning of the reform? Was it really only because of minor changes in the rite that people were exiled and executed ruthlessly and so cruelly? Modern alternative historians believe that this reform was actually the destruction of dual faith in Rus'.

That is, before the reign of Tsar Alexei Mikhailovich in Rus', in fact, there was dual faith - the common people until the 17th century (!) professed not only orthodoxy (Christianity according to the Greek model), but also the old, pre-Christian faith their ancestors - Orthodoxy! The Christian Patriarch Nikon was worried that the Orthodox Old Believers lived by their own principles and did not recognize his authority. Thus, during the reform, Nikon ordered that all liturgical books be rewritten, replacing the term "orthodox Christian faith" with "Orthodox Christian faith." So the ancient Slavic paganism on paper became Christianity.

In ancient, uncorrected texts (for example, the "Father Menaion"), one can still see the old entry in the form of "orthodox Christian faith", and not Orthodox. Thus, all the achievements of pagan Slavic Orthodoxy began to be perceived in the light of history as the achievements of the Christian religion. Nikon's reform caused strong resistance, as a result of which the patriarch was deposed, and in official documents the Christian church began to be again recorded as "orthodox."

So, the true history of Christianity in Rus' is not at all as unambiguous as it is presented in our textbooks, and modern scholars are increasingly talking about this. Until 988, Rus' had its own, old pagan faith, which was called "Orthodoxy".

At the end of the 10th century, Vladimir baptized Rus' according to the Greek canon, making Christianity the state religion. In 1054, Christianity split into Western and Eastern churches, after which the Eastern Christian Church with its center in Constantinople began to be called orthodox. Officially, the term "Orthodoxy" began to be used by the Christian Church only in the middle of the 20th century (!), During the reign of the Bolsheviks, when the term ROC - "Russian Orthodox Church" appeared. Previously, the Russian Christian Church was called "Russian Greek Catholic Church" or "Russian Orthodox Church of the Greek Rite".

Thus, we see that the Christian faith was planted in Rus' with great difficulty, over many centuries, eventually turning into a mixture of Orthodoxy (Christian paganism) and Greek Christianity. If you search well, then in modern Russian Christianity you can find a huge number of rituals, holidays, and even terms that have come here from paganism. Ordinary people in Rus' to such an extent did not want to abandon the old, Orthodox faith that Christianity had to make certain concessions. More about this in Anastasia Novykh's book AllatRa. For example, take a look at this table:

Here is just one quote from the old Russian chronicles, which vividly demonstrates the process of forcible planting of Christianity in Rus' "by fire and sword":

“In Novgorod, people, seeing that Dobrynya was going to baptize them, made a veche and swore all of them not to let them into the city and not to let them refute the idols. And when he came, they, having swept away the great bridge, went out with weapons, and no matter what threats or affectionate words Dobrynya didn’t exhort them, they didn’t even want to hear, and they brought out two large crossbows with many stones, and placed them on the bridge, as if they were their real enemies. The highest above the Slavic priests, Bogomil, who, because of his eloquence, was named the Nightingale, forbade people to submit.

In 1227, after a trial by the archbishop, four wise men were burned in Novgorod, despite the intercession of the boyars, and a year later the archbishop was expelled by the townspeople. In the Synodal edition of the church charter of Prince Vladimir, among the offenses subject to church punishment, they list: “or who prays under a barn or in a grove, or by the water” and the same “sorcery, sorcery”.

The Trinity edition of the charter (16th century) also included those who “pray to creatures, the sun, the moon, stars, clouds, winds, wells, rivers, dubia, mountains, stones.”

What is "Orthodoxy" really? This is not a religion, this is faith, but rule is the causal world that gave birth to gods and Slavic-Aryan ancestors, glory is respect and glorification by the people of life

foundations of their ancestors.

What is Christianity? This is a religion created by the Jews (priests), which is based on the works of Moses and self-interest for the sake of the modified teachings of Christ, who was sent " lost sheep houses of Israel." Jesus was sent to the Jews in order to tell about human values, in response, the Jews crucified him, and then destroyed his true followers for a long time - just as they destroyed the Slavic Magi in the process of planting Christianity in Rus'.

Then the practical Saul (the real name of the Apostle Paul) combined the teachings of Christ with the law of Moses and created something like a new religious brand, which began to spread rapidly around the world, oddly enough. This astonishingly successful enterprise served the interests of hidden players, which we will not discuss in detail in this article. To do this, we recommend that you read the book by Anastasia Novykh "Sensei 4", from which you will learn the whole truth about the process of creating the Christian church and religion in general. We recommend that you do this at least for the sake of broadening your horizons, especially since you can download this book for free here, or by clicking on the quote below.

Read more about this in the books of Anastasia Novykh

Unfortunately, these legends were thoroughly altered when they began to spread Christianity and destroy "pagan", primordially Slavic beliefs, where they replaced information, where they redid it, and where they completely burned birch-bark letters with Old Slavonic records. Then there were serious substitutions with a bias towards the ideology of the Christian religion.

- Anastasia NOVICH - AllatRa

DOSSIER: ACCUSATION - TO CHRISTIANITY... July 1, 2013 Examples of planting Christianity by force and mockery of the shrines of other religions and desecration of the holy places of other religions. Naturally, the list is far from complete ... 860 - to spread Christianity in the Russian lands occupied by the Khazaria, the next "enlighteners" were sent from Byzantium: Cyril and Methodius. "Founders Slavic writing "Study in Korsun (Kherson) the gospel and the psalter, written in Russian scripts (which they themselves mention!), Returning to Byzantium, they" invent " their own script, designed to facilitate translations from Greek into Russian, inventing an additional 11 letters. At the same time, the head of the Russian church was appointed (128 years before the baptism of Rus'!) ... Byzantine Patriarch Photius: and dominate the Russians with the help of the Almighty.” 912 - in the northern part of the Caspian there was an island where the Rus lived, the population of the island was approximately 100,000 people. Here is what the Arab chronicler Al-Marwadi writes about them: “When they converted to Christianity, faith dulled their swords, they returned to need and poverty. So they wanted to become Muslims.” About Olga the Bloody (the first Russian Christian princess) in the Joachim Chronicle it is said that under her “many of the nobles accepted death” 965 - the idol of Devana-Zevana-Dzevana, the Polish goddess of hunting and forests (“Description of European Sarmatia”), was destroyed. 956-986 - Harald the Blue-toothed is trying to introduce Christianity in Denmark by force, until 960, Hakon the Good and Tryggvi, the father of Olaf the Holy in Norway, does the same (“The Saga of the Yom Vikings”). Konstantin Porphyrogenitus: “And the people of the Russians, warlike and godless, through the Distribution of gold, silver and silk clothes, Basil I the Macedonian attracted to the negotiations and, having concluded a peace treaty with him, convinced them to become participants in saving baptism and disposed to accept the bishop.” 988 - book. Saint Vladimir (Basil: the name given at baptism) - the idols of Veles and Delight were exterminated, the idol of Perun was beaten with sticks and horses dragged through the whole of Kiev, the idols of Khors, Stribog, Simargl, Makoshi, Dazhdbog were destroyed. “And whoever doesn’t come will be disgusting to me,” said Vlidimir. (And you don’t need to tell stories that “disgusting” is not “hostile”, but “not pleasant.” Tell this story to linguists and Slavists. It translates precisely as “hostile.”) Rus' was baptized in a bloody font, illuminated by the glow of conflagrations. 989-990 - "Holy Prince Vladimir" in the process of baptism committed a massacre in Novgorod. Prince Vladimir, during the conquest and baptism of the White Croats, destroyed dozens of cities and villages. Stephen of Perm destroyed the original civilization of the Komi people (annalistic Perm). “The Life of Blessed Volodymyr”, a quote from A.V. Kartashev "Essays on the history of the Russian Church": Commanded to chop down the church and put in place where the idols stand. And build the church of St. Basil on the hill, where the idol of Perun and others stand, where the prince and the people are needed. Otherwise, put churches in hail and bring priests and people to baptism in all towns and villages ... and the whole Russian land is torn out of their lips by the devil and brought to God and to the true light ... and baptize the whole Russian land from end to end. Idol temples and trebishche everywhere excavate and cut and destroy idols: and decorate churches with honest icons. An excerpt from the “Joachim Chronicle”: In Novegrad, people, having taken Dobrynya the hedgehog, go to baptize me, make a veche and swear not to let everyone into the city and not let the idols be refuted. And when they came, they, having swept away the great bridge, came out with weapons, and asce Dobrynya, with a rebuke and good words, weighed them down, both of them didn’t even want to hear and hung out 2 great vices with a lot of stones, putting them on the bridge, as if they were their own enemies. The highest above the priests of the Slavs, Bogomil, for the sake of sweet speech, he was named the Nightingale, lords forbidding the people to submit. We are standing in a trading country, walking through the markets and streets, learning people, how much we can. But we perish in wickedness the word of the cross, like an apostle of rivers, appearing as madness and deceit. And so we stayed for two days, baptizing several hundreds. Then the Tysetsky Novgorod Ugony, driving everywhere, yelled: “It’s better for us to die, rather than our gods give to reproach.” The people of this country, having become furious, ruined the house of Dobrynin, plundered the estate, robbed his wife and some of his relatives. Tysetsky Vladimirov Putyata, like a sensible and brave husband, having prepared a lodia, choosing a husband from Rostov 500, having transported over the city to his country and entering the city, I’ve harmed anyone, seeing all the teas of his wars of life. He reached the court of Ugonyaev, onago and other previous husbands yat and abie sent to Dobrynya across the river. The people of the country, having heard this, gathered up to 5000, stumbled Putyata, and slashed evil between them. a certain church of the Transfiguration of the Lord was scattered and the houses of Christians were raked. Even in the development of Dobrynya, with all the bitches, he came with him and ordered some houses to be set on fire near the shore, which made people more frightening in the past, I ran to put out the fire; and Abie ceased to flog, then the previous men, having come to Dobrynya, asking for peace. Dobrynya, having gathered howls, forbid robbery and abies CRUSH idols, BURN WOOD, AND BREAK STONES INTO THE VERGOSH RIVER; and for the wicked the sorrow is great. Husbands and wives, who saw this, with a great cry and tears, passed for me, as if for their gods. Dobrynya, mocking, is weighty to them: “What, madness, you regret those who cannot defend themselves, what benefit can you expect from them.” And she sent everywhere, announcing that they should go to baptism. Sparrow is a posadnik, the son of Stoyanov, who was brought up under Vladimir and was very sweet-spoken, this go to the torzhishche and more than all weighed down. Idosha mnozi, but DO NOT BE BAPTIZED WAR VLACHAKHA AND KRESCHAKHA, men are above the bridge, and wives are below the bridge. Then many people who have not been baptized will tell about myself to be baptized; For this reason, I commanded all baptized wooden crosses, ovo coppers and marques to lay on the neck, and ALSO DO NOT HAVE, DO NOT BELIEVE AND BAPTIZE; and abie the smashed-out church with a paki construction. And baptizing tacos, Putyata go to Kyiv. This is why the people vilify the Novgorodians: Baptize Putyata with a sword, and Dobrynya with fire. Dobrynya and Putyata, Joachim Korsunian baptize Novgorodians with fire and sword (Joachim Chronicle). Those who did not want to be baptized went “to the deserts and forests”, fled, leaving everything behind. Excavations in Novgorod confirmed the burning of half of the city during the christening. Establishment of the "Church Charter of St. Vladimir", which prescribed the burning of the Magi. 995-1002 - Olaf Trygvasson begins the introduction of Christianity in Norway, desecrates the temple of Thor ("The Saga of Olaf Trygvasson"). 995 - Prince Mstislav of Chernigov and Tmutarakan, who accepted the Christian faith, destroyed the idol of Marena-Marzhena-Martsana. 1008 - the sacred grove (Svyatobor) of the Sorbs near Merseburg was destroyed by the Bishop of Merseburg ("Wagner's discourse on the idolatry of the ancient inhabitants of Misnia", Leipzig, 1698) 1024 - Large-scale planting of Christianity by force in Suzdal (suppressed by Yaroslav Khromy ("The Wise")) , in Murom and in Rostov - the Rostov bishops Hilarion and Fedor, then Leonty. [cm. Novgorod IV Chronicle, "The Tale of the Placement of Christianity in Murom" and Korsakov. D., Merya and the Rostov Principality. History of the Rostov-Suzdal land. 1872, Kazan] ... "The Life of Bishop Leonty" and "The Life of Konstantin of Murom". Both are very distinguished in the "overthrow of idols." Leonty was killed for excessive zeal by outraged Rostovites. 1050s - Monk Abraham overthrew the idol Veles in Rostov and began to actively promote Christianity. Putting a church on this site. 1071 - The murder of the Magi in Kyiv ("and bringing his demons into the ditch", Pereyaslav chronicler). In the same year - in the Rostov-Yaroslavl land and in Novgorod uprisings against the arbitrariness perpetrated by Christian baptists. In Rostov - Jan Vyshatich tortured and then executed the Magi. Laurentian Chronicle, PSRL: “Two Magi rose up near Yaroslavl. And they came to Belozero, and there were 300 people with them. At that time, it happened to come from Svyatoslav to Yan, the son of Vyshatin, who was collecting tribute. Yang ordered to beat them and pull out their beards. When they were beaten and pulled out with a split beard, Yan asked them: what do the Gods say to you? They answered: so the Gods say to us: we shall not live from you. And Yan said to them: they told you the truth. And seizing them, they killed them and hung them on an oak tree. 1069-76 - "Pacification" of the Slavic-Finnish pagans of Beloozero by Jan Vyshatich. "The Tale of Bygone Years" and the Chronicler of Pereyaslavl-Zalessky. At the same time, Prince Gleb Svyatoslavich and Bishop Fedor massacre (genocide) pagans in Novgorod. 1091 - The suppression of the Magi in Rostov ("the Magi will perish soon") - PSRL I-75-78, 92 and the Pereyaslav Chronicler. Beginning of the 11th century, western Slavia - Kumir Prove was overthrown by the Bishop of Altenburg Herold by his own hand, he also burned the sacred forest of Prove (Adam of Bremen "Acts of the Bishops of the Hamburg Church", about 1083). Between 1063 and 1157, the temple of Radegast (Retrino Temple) in the city of Retra was repeatedly burned on the land of the Lutiches-retars. The last time by the German sovereign Lothar. Melted bronze idols of the Luticians, 85 pieces from the Temple, were found at the beginning of the 18th century and described in 1774-1795. Many figurines contain Slavic runic inscriptions, as on the Mikorzhinsky stones (Poland, Poznan Voivodeship). XI century - In Bohemia, Bretislav II burned sacred groves and persecuted the Gentiles. Pagan uprisings are suppressed in Poland. XII century - Rules of Metropolitan John: do not give communion to those who walk according to the Magi (now it seems "insignificant", but in those days this measure was quite a serious means of turning a citizen off public life, damaged his honor and made such a citizen an outcast or "dissident"). 1150s - "Holy Prince Alexander Nevsky" committed a massacre in Novgorod (and this is not a battlefield, this is the murder of civilians, civilians). Also, among the baptists, the principle was in full force: "beat your own so that strangers are afraid." Already in those days, the church dealt harshly with its opponents and demanded the same from secular power: The Novgorod bishop Luka Zhidyata, who lived in the 11th century, is called by the chronicler "the bestial". “This tormentor,” says the chronicler, “cut the heads and beards, burned out the eyes, cut off the tongue, crucified and tortured others.” Church opponents were burned at the stake and in red-hot iron cauldrons. 1168-69 - Bishop Absalon threw the idol of Rugevit in the city of Karenze (Rügen), his legs were cut off, and Bishop Sven sat astride the deposed deity and rode it around the city (Saxon Gramatik, History of the Danes), Porevit's idols were destroyed by him and Porenuch. 1168, June 15 - after the Danish king Valdemar I captured the island of Ruyan, the temple of Sventovit was desecrated and plundered, the idol of Sventovit, along with other images of pagan idols, was exterminated by Bishop Absalon (Helmgold "Slavic Chronicle". Until 1177). 1169 - "Holy Prince Andrei Bogolyubsky" burned Kyiv and raped half of the city. 1206 - the idol of Mokosh was destroyed in Novgorod at the Market and the Church of Paraskeva Pyatnitsa was erected. XII century. - He was famous for his savage cruelty Rostov Bishop Fedor. The chronicler says about him that he “was a merciless tormentor, chopped off the heads of one, burned out the eyes of others and cut their tongues, crucified others on the wall and tortured mercilessly” [ complete collection Russian chronicles, vol. II, St. Petersburg 1843, p. 102.]. XII century. - The Benedictines overthrow the idols of Lada, Water (Body) and Lelya on a bald mountain near the village of Kielce (Poland). They build a church there. And then the monastery. (“The Tale of the 16th century on the construction of a Benedictine monastery on Bald Mountain”). 1227 - Novgorod, four wise men were brought to the bishop's court and burned there: "four wise men were burned in Yaroslavl court" with the permission of the archbishop. Nikon Chronicle, v.10, St. Petersburg, 1862: “Magi, sorcerers, accomplices appeared in Novogorod, and many sorcery, and indulgence, and signs worked. The Novgorodians caught them and brought the wise men to the courtyard of the husbands of Prince Yaroslav, and tied all the wise men, and threw them into the fire, and then they all burned down. End of the 13th century. - Justifying the practice of massacres against dissidents and resisters, the hierarchs Orthodox Church willingly referred to the activities biblical characters. So, at the end of the 13th century, Bishop Serapion of Vladimir, calling for reprisals against "sorcerers" and "witches", pointed to the example of the prophet and King David in Jerusalem, who eradicated "all those who work lawlessness: some by murder, others by imprisonment, and others by imprisonment in prison" [E. Petukhov, Serapion Vladimirsky, Russian preacher of the XIII century, St. Petersburg 1888, p. 65.]. Have the leaders of the church seen that the extermination of people contradicts certain provisions gospel preaching ? They could not fail to see this, but they remembered the evangelical mercy only when it was beneficial for them. 1285 - Pilot book. "to excommunicate from the church those who go to the Magi and Obavniki." 1375 - Novgorod. Execution of heretics-strigolnikov. 1411 - Pskov. 12 "prophetic zhonok" (sorcerers, witches) were burned. 1484 - the bull of Inokentius VIII, 100 thousand people were convicted. 1485 - 41 witches burned in Piedmont. 1490 - The Council demanded the death penalty for heretics, Ivan III prevented. 1499 - The book "Instruction of the clergy". Against paganism. Beginning of the 16th century - Execution of Thomas, cousin of Dmitry Tveretinov (iconoclasts). 1504 - the cathedral decided to burn Ivan Volk-Kuritsin, Dmitry Konoplev and Ivan Maksimov in a cage, which was carried out. 1515 - Over 500 witches burned and destroyed. 1505 - Teachings against paganism in the "Charter of Metropolitans Photius and Daniel", "Domostroy" and "Stoglav" prescribe the punishment of the Magi and those who know magicians. 1551 - Ivan the Terrible writes to Metropolitan Macarius: “They took the veil as monks for the sake of bodily peace, so that they could always go out to banquet. Intoxication immeasurable, debauchery, Sodom sin. The hermit fathers walk around with icons, allegedly collecting money for the construction of a monastery, but in fact in order to drink them away. All this priesthood existed at the expense of the labor of the Russian serf. About 80,000 serfs worked at the Trinity-Sergius Monastery alone. 1552 - Teachings against paganism in the Sudebnik. 1564 - Ivan IV, a letter to Kurbsky: "Nowhere did you find that the kingdom would be ruined, hedgehog from the priests to rule." XVI century - Bishop of Novgorod writes to Metropolitan Zosima: “Ano Fryazova, according to their faith, what a fortress they hold! The ambassador of the Caesars told me about the king of Spain, how he cleansed his land, and sent those speeches and a list to you - they take envy and want to learn from the experience of the Inquisition ... "Statistics: for 1601-1700. 483 editions of books were published in Moscow. Of these, NOT religious - only 7 (seven). 1648 - Decree of the Christian monarch Alexei Mikhailovich on the prohibition of songs, holidays, dances, games. It is forbidden even to swing on a swing (!). It is forbidden to bury fallen soldiers in the mountains (mounds) and to hold a feast (commemoration with a feast). The decree mentioned the dangers of buffoons, ordered to break the pipes, psaltery, etc., and those who followed the buffoons (imitates, masquerades) were prescribed batogs and exile. SPLIT: After the decisions of the Council of 1666, the unrepentant remnants of the strigolniks of the Solovetsky Monastery, at the insistence of Patriarch Joachim, were executed more than 50 people. The founder of the Old Believers, Archpriest Avvakum, for example, protested against the persecution that his followers were subjected to, precisely on the basis that the New Testament did not recommend doing so. “With fire, and with a whip,” he angrily asked his tormentors, “yes, they want to establish the faith with the gallows! Which apostles taught like this?” ["The Life of Archpriest Avvakum", M. 1934, p.137]. But he himself voluptuously dreams of how he would deal with his opponents, if he were able to: day… First of all, they would have cut that Nikon, the dog, into four, and then those Nikonians” ["The Life of Archpriest Avvakum", p.301]. The matter ended with the burning of Avvakum. There is no doubt that if he had gained the upper hand, he would have burned his opponents with the same zeal - and also in the name of piety, based on the teachings and examples of the Old and New Testaments. ["Books and Bibles" by I.A. Kryvlev] 1682 (April) - the burning of Avvakuum, Lazarus, Fedor, Epiphanius. 1682 (July 5) - the burning of the priest Nikita Dobrynin and others. 1684 - Decree of Joachim: schismatics to be tortured, if they do not submit - to be executed by burning. There was also a penalty for harboring. Stefan Yavorsky: “It is worthy and righteous to kill heretics, it is useful for a heretic to die, and good deeds happen to those who are always killed.” 1716 - double taxes were introduced for the Old Believers; since 1726 - quadruple. 1721 - a decree of the Synod was issued, according to which "diocesan inquisitors" were introduced in each Russian diocese, and "proto-inquisitors" were placed above them. The ROC carried out its inquisitorial activities through the judicial bodies at the disposal of the diocesan bishops, through the patriarchal court and church councils. She also had special bodies created to investigate cases against religion and the Church: the Order of Spiritual Affairs, the Order of Inquisitorial Affairs, the Schismatic and Newly Baptized offices, etc. 19th century. - The church ideologist of those times, Theophan the Recluse (1815-1894), later recognized as a saint by the Russian Orthodox Church, addressing the authorities, wrote: “We must stop the freedom of intentions - shut the mouths of journalists and newspapermen! Declaring disbelief a state crime. To prohibit material views under the death penalty!” 1905 - Metropolitan Vladimir and Bishop Nikon of Serpukhov concocted a "sermon" that was to be read on October 16 in all churches, where everyone was called to "wake up and rise up" against the "monsters of the human race", even if you had to "die for the tsar and for Rus' ". This was followed by a series of massacres. 1909 - 32 bishops were in the Black Hundred. 1917 - Reaction to the separation of church and state: "It is better to shed your blood and be worthy of a martyr's crown than to allow the Orthodox faith to be mocked by enemies" - ("Church Messenger") Note: there were no persecutions of priests then, this happened a little later . etc... etc... These are the fruits of Christianity. Joshua of Nazareth once said: “By their fruits you will know them… A good tree cannot bear bad fruit.” Well, following folk saying, "We will measure you with your own arshin!". Every honest person knowing history, sees direct analogies of Christianity with fascism and communism. Therefore, it causes at least bewilderment when the bloody crimes of political regimes and ideologies in the history of Mankind are “recognized” and “unambiguously condemned”, while no less terrible and bloody crimes of religious regimes and ideologies are “unobvious”. In fact, if we evaluate all such actions from an unbiased legal point of view, then all monotheistic ideologies and regimes as a sentence, as they say, simply “VYSHAK is breaking down”! And what other sentence can be "under aggravating circumstances"? : malicious recidivism as part of an organized group with special cynicism and cruelty on an especially large scale, non-recognition of one's guilt, lack of remorse for the deed.